After reboot, channels get re-ordered but associated scopes not. #279

Closed
opened 2026-10-27 15:47:36 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
Owner

Describe the bug

I usually have public channel slot #0 empty, and use it only from time to time for Public or some local test channel.

Also other channel slots get empty during usage when I leave them again.

When I reboot the device, the channels get re-ordered to fill up the channel slots starting from #0 without any gap, but the scopes stay associated to the original slots.

Result:

  • Unfamiliar channel sorting (especially, when I now restore Public, it is no longer at the beginning since #0 was filled up with a channel that was at a different slot before),
  • Scopes associated to channels are wrong.

Which device are you using

LilyGO T-Deck Plus

Which Firmware are you using

v0.9.12.3
(Was not present in v0.9.12. Intermediate versions I have not tested.)

Regards!

**Describe the bug** I usually have public channel slot `#0` empty, and use it only from time to time for `Public` or some local test channel. Also other channel slots get empty during usage when I leave them again. When I reboot the device, the channels get re-ordered to fill up the channel slots starting from `#0` without any gap, but the scopes stay associated to the original slots. Result: * Unfamiliar channel sorting (especially, when I now restore `Public`, it is no longer at the beginning since `#0` was filled up with a channel that was at a different slot before), * Scopes associated to channels are wrong. **Which device are you using** LilyGO T-Deck Plus **Which Firmware are you using** v0.9.12.3 (Was not present in v0.9.12. Intermediate versions I have not tested.) Regards! <!-- github-sync-id:4572707082 -->
adam closed this issue 2026-10-27 15:47:36 +01:00
Author
Owner

Fixed (v0.9.13)

  • Mgmt scopes #279: after reboot, channel scope assignments stay aligned with channel slots
### Fixed (v0.9.13) - **Mgmt scopes #279:** after reboot, channel scope assignments stay aligned with channel slots <!-- github-comment-id:4607992637 -->
Author
Owner

What would actually be the better user experience is to not touch channel sorting at all.

What would actually be the better user experience is to not touch channel sorting at all. <!-- github-comment-id:4614063529 -->
Author
Owner

Can confirm. Regards!

Can confirm. Regards! <!-- github-comment-id:6061139652 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/meshcore#279