adam/znc
1
0 Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/znc/znc.git synced 2026-11-03 10:52:22 +01:00
Code Issues 362 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove partyline #894

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-05 04:51:16 +02:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:51:16 +02:00
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

I think most users who enable partyline are misguidingly thinking it's 100% functional, and supporting them is a bit annoying. Clearly nobody has cared to fix it since 1.0 so it's on nobodies priority list. I'd say we should remove it entirely and refer to it as a third party module.

I think most users who enable partyline are misguidingly thinking it's 100% functional, and supporting them is a bit annoying. Clearly nobody has cared to fix it since 1.0 so it's on nobodies priority list. I'd say we should remove it entirely and refer to it as a third party module. <!-- github-sync-id:399866294 -->
adam closed this issue 2026-10-05 04:51:16 +02:00
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:51:17 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

While I don't disagree, the source code would need to move somewhere else for it to be considered "third party". If we want to consider it as a third party module, it needs to be accessible.

I would be more in favor of just removing it entirely, rather than calling it a "third party module". Anyone who wants it can dig around in the source code for older versions of the released tarballs to refer to the source code for the module and 'add it' if they want it.

While I don't disagree, the source code would need to move somewhere else for it to be considered "third party". If we want to consider it as a third party module, it needs to be accessible. I would be more in favor of just removing it entirely, rather than calling it a "third party module". Anyone who wants it can dig around in the source code for older versions of the released tarballs to refer to the source code for the module and 'add it' if they want it. <!-- github-comment-id:454839542 -->
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:51:17 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

yep, if source code edits beyond that are needed it's just extra unnecessary maintenance I don't think we should want.

yep, if source code edits beyond that are needed it's just extra unnecessary maintenance I don't think we should want. <!-- github-comment-id:454894619 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam (Adam Wojcieszonek)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/znc#894