adam/znc
1
0 Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/znc/znc.git synced 2026-10-31 01:32:02 +01:00
Code Issues 362 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

webif: as there already are 'save and return' and 'save and cont' - why no 'dicard and return' #386

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-10-05 04:17:28 +02:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:17:28 +02:00
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

When on a users webpage tthere already are 'save and return' and 'save and cont' - why no 'dicard and return'-Button on the bottom ?

Some Browsers Back-Button show 'scary' messages

--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4257689-webif-as-there-already-are-save-and-return-and-save-and-cont-why-no-dicard-and-return?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F1759&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F1759&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
When on a users webpage tthere already are 'save and return' and 'save and cont' - why no 'dicard and return'-Button on the bottom ? Some Browsers Back-Button show 'scary' messages ## <bountysource-plugin> --- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/4257689-webif-as-there-already-are-save-and-return-and-save-and-cont-why-no-dicard-and-return?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F1759&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F1759&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github). </bountysource-plugin> <!-- github-sync-id:42153016 -->
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:17:29 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

#227 supersedes this, if breadcrumbs on the top are clickable.

#227 supersedes this, if breadcrumbs on the top are clickable. <!-- github-comment-id:54761737 -->
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:17:30 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

Hm, a bad implementation of #227 wouldn't solve this (a good implementation will), so let it be opened for now...

Hm, a bad implementation of #227 wouldn't solve this (a good implementation will), so let it be opened for now... <!-- github-comment-id:54761889 -->
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:17:30 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

How about Ok, Apply, and Cancel? :)

How about Ok, Apply, and Cancel? :) <!-- github-comment-id:55238199 -->
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:17:31 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

What should be the difference between ok and apply ?

What should be the difference between ok and apply ? <!-- github-comment-id:55540874 -->
adam commented 2026-10-05 04:17:32 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

Usually

  • OK - save & close configuration
  • Apply - Save & keep the configuration open
  • Cancel = discard changes & close configuration

That sounds like Windows to me and that is probably the reason for :).

Usually - OK - save & close configuration - Apply - Save & keep the configuration open - Cancel = discard changes & close configuration That sounds like Windows to me and that is probably the reason for `:)`. <!-- github-comment-id:55549081 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam (Adam Wojcieszonek)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/znc#386