Ever thought of using the GNU AGPL? So that forks of your projetc must open source their code and if someone runs a modified NNTPChan node they must open source their changes as well?
Ever thought of using the GNU AGPL? So that forks of your projetc must open source their code and if someone runs a modified NNTPChan node they must open source their changes as well?
<!-- github-sync-id:158517293 -->
what I meant to say is that I dislike AGPL's viral properties, specifically how GPL 3 code cannot be used in non GPL 3 licensed code.
i used the wrong word here.
what I meant to say is that I dislike AGPL's viral properties, specifically how GPL 3 code cannot be used in non GPL 3 licensed code.
<!-- github-comment-id:223770980 -->
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Ever thought of using the GNU AGPL? So that forks of your projetc must open source their code and if someone runs a modified NNTPChan node they must open source their changes as well?
I personally dislike the virility clauses in GPL3 which is why I have chosen MIT/X11.
Okay 😄
Whart does "virility" mean?
i used the wrong word here.
what I meant to say is that I dislike AGPL's viral properties, specifically how GPL 3 code cannot be used in non GPL 3 licensed code.
Oh really.
I wish license writing could be easy. So that everyone could make a license that suits their needs.