adam/meshview
1
0 Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pablorevilla-meshtastic/meshview.git synced 2026-10-31 03:01:58 +01:00
Code Issues 20 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Feature Request: Better discoverability for overlapping nodes on the map. #34

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-10-05 06:03:00 +02:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2026-10-05 06:03:00 +02:00
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

Location precision settings have the effect of clustering nearby nodes in the same position on the map. Currently it is difficult to see how many nodes are in a map location or access the nodes below the top one. A clustering solution might be the best, however a workaround could be to at least cycle through the node markers at the click target area.

Location precision settings have the effect of clustering nearby nodes in the same position on the map. Currently it is difficult to see how many nodes are in a map location or access the nodes below the top one. A clustering solution might be the best, however a workaround could be to at least cycle through the node markers at the click target area. <!-- github-sync-id:3716474586 -->
adam closed this issue 2026-10-05 06:03:00 +02:00
adam commented 2026-10-05 06:03:01 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy link
Copy source

Scott, sorry for the long delay.. I was not sure how to fix this problem and still show the nodes in the map. I decided to add a little of jitter in the map.html rendering so that the maps are just a few meter off. It does not change the node position or the info that is received... just how we display them so that we can see overlapping nodes. for now that is all I am thinking of doing and has been since version 3.0.5. :)

Scott, sorry for the long delay.. I was not sure how to fix this problem and still show the nodes in the map. I decided to add a little of jitter in the map.html rendering so that the maps are just a few meter off. It does not change the node position or the info that is received... just how we display them so that we can see overlapping nodes. for now that is all I am thinking of doing and has been since version 3.0.5. :) <!-- github-comment-id:4493055820 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
No items
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam (Adam Wojcieszonek)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/meshview#34