Replace custom tailwindcss-typography with @tailwindcss/typography #32

Closed
opened 2026-10-05 05:10:32 +02:00 by adam · 8 comments
Owner

Now that there's an official Tailwind typography plugin, let's move the blog's current use of tailwindcss-typography over to the newer replacement. May not be necessary for initial site launch, but should definitely happen in conjunction with any visual rebranding work.

Now that there's an official [Tailwind typography plugin](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography), let's move the blog's current use of `tailwindcss-typography` over to the newer replacement. May not be necessary for initial site launch, but should definitely happen in conjunction with any visual rebranding work. <!-- github-sync-id:815771668 -->
adam closed this issue 2026-10-05 05:10:32 +02:00
Author
Owner

@zebateira @jdiogopeixoto Do we want to take care of this pre-launch, or backfill it as part of work on the main ipfs.io replatform?

@zebateira @jdiogopeixoto Do we want to take care of this pre-launch, or backfill it as part of work on the main ipfs.io replatform? <!-- github-comment-id:809504199 -->
Author
Owner

@jessicaschilling I don't think we should do this pre-launch. We need to update the tailwind version to do this and I'm afraid that some things might break.

@jessicaschilling I don't think we should do this pre-launch. We need to update the tailwind version to do this and I'm afraid that some things might break. <!-- github-comment-id:809519355 -->
Author
Owner

@jdiogopeixoto Makes sense. Let's make sure the main ipfs.io replatform uses the latest tailwind version and we can backfill it from there?

@jdiogopeixoto Makes sense. Let's make sure the main ipfs.io replatform uses the latest tailwind version and we can backfill it from there? <!-- github-comment-id:809587785 -->
Author
Owner

Quick update on this one, I managed to upgrade the tailwind version in the #99. I still think that we should delay this because it requires some changes. It's better to do this with time so we can guarantee that everything works/looks as expected.

Quick update on this one, I managed to upgrade the tailwind version in the #99. I still think that we should delay this because it requires some changes. It's better to do this with time so we can guarantee that everything works/looks as expected. <!-- github-comment-id:814460990 -->
Author
Owner

Sounds good.

Sounds good. <!-- github-comment-id:814464559 -->
Author
Owner

Yep agree, the tailwind switch can come later +1

Yep agree, the tailwind switch can come later +1 <!-- github-comment-id:814466298 -->
Author
Owner

As discussed sync today — @jdiogopeixoto and @zebateira are working on this with an aim to create as much consistency between the blog and the main IPFS website as possible.

As discussed sync today — @jdiogopeixoto and @zebateira are working on this with an aim to create as much consistency between the blog and the main IPFS website as possible. <!-- github-comment-id:863416085 -->
Author
Owner
Ref https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-blog/pull/257. <!-- github-comment-id:864203014 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/ipfs-blog#32