will get an extra /header_images/ on LazyImage src path
header images added like https://app.forestry.io/sites/o1m1vi-99lz4lw/#/pages/src-_blog-weekly-112-welcome-to-ipfs-weekly-112-md/
will get an extra `/header_images/` on `LazyImage` src path

<!-- github-sync-id:786699372 -->
@jessicaschilling following with what was discussed in #13, and after talking with @Ricardo-Silva91 today, we came to a conclusion that the header_images directory shouldn't exist as it only makes things more confusing.
The reasoning behind that is when we create a new blog post and add a new header_image, Forestry will upload the image to the public directory. There's no way to configure a specific field to upload to a different path.
With that being said, if we keep the header_images directory we would only be able to add images to it manually, which I think it's pointless since we want to use Forestry to manage the blog.
If we move the images to the public directory root we can follow the same naming convention you suggested in #13:
Header images that belong a specific blog post we can use weekly-001-header-image.png
Header images that are used in multiple posts we can use header-image-weekly-newsletter.png
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
@jessicaschilling following with what was discussed in #13, and after talking with @Ricardo-Silva91 today, we came to a conclusion that the `header_images` directory shouldn't exist as it only makes things more confusing.
The reasoning behind that is when we create a new blog post and add a new `header_image`, Forestry will upload the image to the `public` directory. There's no way to configure a specific field to upload to a different path.
With that being said, if we keep the `header_images` directory we would only be able to add images to it manually, which I think it's pointless since we want to use Forestry to manage the blog.
If we move the images to the `public` directory root we can follow the same naming convention you suggested in `#13`:
- Header images that belong a specific blog post we can use `weekly-001-header-image.png`
- Header images that are used in multiple posts we can use `header-image-weekly-newsletter.png`
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
<!-- github-comment-id:761118777 -->
For future uploads in new blog posts we'll need to make a naming convention clear in our "how-to" guidance, though, since we will rely on the user to correctly name things they upload. Is there any sort of affordance within Forestry to add a note/caption on the image upload area of the post editor?
Agree, thanks for digging into that.
For future uploads in new blog posts we'll need to make a naming convention clear in our "how-to" guidance, though, since we will rely on the user to correctly name things they upload. Is there any sort of affordance within Forestry to add a note/caption on the image upload area of the post editor?
<!-- github-comment-id:761124291 -->
Yes, there is a description field we can use to add more information about the field, that should help.
Yes, there is a `description` field we can use to add more information about the field, that should help.
<img width="1405" alt="Screenshot 2021-01-15 at 19 04 04" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/34691925/104767710-8551aa80-5764-11eb-8d97-6c8e0c9c4283.png">
<!-- github-comment-id:761131072 -->
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
header images added like https://app.forestry.io/sites/o1m1vi-99lz4lw/#/pages/src-_blog-weekly-112-welcome-to-ipfs-weekly-112-md/
will get an extra

/header_images/onLazyImagesrc path@jessicaschilling following with what was discussed in #13, and after talking with @Ricardo-Silva91 today, we came to a conclusion that the
header_imagesdirectory shouldn't exist as it only makes things more confusing.The reasoning behind that is when we create a new blog post and add a new
header_image, Forestry will upload the image to thepublicdirectory. There's no way to configure a specific field to upload to a different path.With that being said, if we keep the
header_imagesdirectory we would only be able to add images to it manually, which I think it's pointless since we want to use Forestry to manage the blog.If we move the images to the
publicdirectory root we can follow the same naming convention you suggested in#13:weekly-001-header-image.pngheader-image-weekly-newsletter.pngPlease let me know your thoughts on this.
Agree, thanks for digging into that.
For future uploads in new blog posts we'll need to make a naming convention clear in our "how-to" guidance, though, since we will rely on the user to correctly name things they upload. Is there any sort of affordance within Forestry to add a note/caption on the image upload area of the post editor?
Yes, there is a
descriptionfield we can use to add more information about the field, that should help.Awesome - I'll open a new issue for adding those notes (and some other related content), and assign it to myself.