tracking stars and commit date colums #2

Closed
opened 2026-10-04 23:11:25 +02:00 by adam · 9 comments
Owner

Does it make sense to include number of start and start date in the various tables? I was thinking it could be better using this space for something along the lines of platforms supported e.g. Windows / Linux / MacOS / Web or possibly even using icons to represent them?

This would impact sections:

  • Free and Open Source apps
  • Proprietary apps
  • Free and Open Source firmware

"Free and Open Source firmware" potentially not needing further columns as it's mostly shared in description and name what hardware they are for/

Does it make sense to include number of start and start date in the various tables? I was thinking it could be better using this space for something along the lines of platforms supported e.g. Windows / Linux / MacOS / Web or possibly even using icons to represent them? This would impact sections: - Free and Open Source apps - Proprietary apps - Free and Open Source firmware "Free and Open Source firmware" potentially not needing further columns as it's mostly shared in description and name what hardware they are for/ <!-- github-sync-id:3947863286 -->
adam closed this issue 2026-10-04 23:11:26 +02:00
Author
Owner

I quite like the stars, but they are out of date already. I think there used to be a way to embed the star number direct from the repo in a bit of markdown. I might have a look if that's still possible somehow. The start date I thought was relevant context for the star number, a 2yo project is likely to get more stars than a 2week old one.. I guess ideally you'd get a 'new stars in last three month metric. But that starts to sound overcomplicated for whats essentially a list..

Agree supported platforms might be good..

I quite like the stars, but they are out of date already. I think there used to be a way to embed the star number direct from the repo in a bit of markdown. I might have a look if that's still possible somehow. The start date I thought was relevant context for the star number, a 2yo project is likely to get more stars than a 2week old one.. I guess ideally you'd get a 'new stars in last three month metric. But that starts to sound overcomplicated for whats essentially a list.. Agree supported platforms might be good.. <!-- github-comment-id:3910652243 -->
Author
Owner

I quite like the stars, but they are out of date already. I think there used to be a way to embed the star number direct from the repo in a bit of markdown. I might have a look if that's still possible somehow. The start date I thought was relevant context for the star number, a 2yo project is likely to get more stars than a 2week old one.. I guess ideally you'd get a 'new stars in last three month metric. But that starts to sound overcomplicated for whats essentially a list..

Agree supported platforms might be good..

I just made PR #20 that fixes the dates and stars.

> I quite like the stars, but they are out of date already. I think there used to be a way to embed the star number direct from the repo in a bit of markdown. I might have a look if that's still possible somehow. The start date I thought was relevant context for the star number, a 2yo project is likely to get more stars than a 2week old one.. I guess ideally you'd get a 'new stars in last three month metric. But that starts to sound overcomplicated for whats essentially a list.. > > Agree supported platforms might be good.. I just made PR #20 that fixes the dates and stars. <!-- github-comment-id:3931425791 -->
Author
Owner

Nice, thanks! I removed the '20' from 2025 to save a bit of space. Also stuck meshcore open at the top of the list, I know it has less stars, but I like it and want to give it visibility

Nice, thanks! I removed the '20' from 2025 to save a bit of space. Also stuck meshcore open at the top of the list, I know it has less stars, but I like it and want to give it visibility <!-- github-comment-id:3934298977 -->
Author
Owner

Your map is very cool btw, just checking it out properly now https://github.com/yellowcooln/meshcore-mqtt-live-map/

Your map is very cool btw, just checking it out properly now https://github.com/yellowcooln/meshcore-mqtt-live-map/ <!-- github-comment-id:3934342246 -->
Author
Owner

Closing for now, since stars are recently updated, will have to re-do every few months until we find a way to automate

Closing for now, since stars are recently updated, will have to re-do every few months until we find a way to automate <!-- github-comment-id:3938508079 -->
Author
Owner
Ah someone suggested eg https://img.shields.io/github/stars/samuk/awesome-meshcore?style=social Let's use those.. <!-- github-comment-id:3938536974 -->
Author
Owner

OK I did the first table. Second one still needs doing

OK I did the first table. Second one still needs doing <!-- github-comment-id:3938574128 -->
Author
Owner

any objections if I move the stars back to their own column, I think where they are now, detracts from the project names.

I can also do the other table with stars, where possible?

any objections if I move the stars back to their own column, I think where they are now, detracts from the project names. I can also do the other table with stars, where possible? <!-- github-comment-id:3947848793 -->
Author
Owner

...would also be good to alphabetize the tables to help with manual searching of names

...would also be good to alphabetize the tables to help with manual searching of names <!-- github-comment-id:3947851637 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/awesome-meshcore#2