Dedicated power for beacon #271

Open
opened 2026-10-05 05:56:06 +02:00 by adam · 3 comments
Owner

I have some igate devices working as digipeater (remote mountain position, solar power, EM mode ON, no internet), igate are down in the valley and can be reach with 1/10 mW. So to save battery and reduce QRM power at digipeater is reduced to 5mW.

At same time I'd like to keep using more power at beacon transmission (every 30m) to investigate coverage area.

Is it possible, in future release, to handle a dedicated power for beacon transmission?

73, Silvio IZ5DIY

I have some igate devices working as digipeater (remote mountain position, solar power, EM mode ON, no internet), igate are down in the valley and can be reach with 1/10 mW. So to save battery and reduce QRM power at digipeater is reduced to 5mW. At same time I'd like to keep using more power at beacon transmission (every 30m) to investigate coverage area. Is it possible, in future release, to handle a dedicated power for beacon transmission? 73, Silvio IZ5DIY <!-- github-sync-id:4377847921 -->
Author
Owner

hi Silvio,

is a good idea !!

so you propose to have a different value for the Station Beacon than the values of the repeated packets ?

what do you think to add this as a experimental topic (as I had this some time ago) as to study the coverage area is a "momentary" process

hi Silvio, is a good idea !! so you propose to have a different value for the Station Beacon than the values of the repeated packets ? what do you think to add this as a experimental topic (as I had this some time ago) as to study the coverage area is a "momentary" process <!-- github-comment-id:4372529241 -->
Author
Owner

Ciao Ricardo

hi Silvio,

is a good idea !!

so you propose to have a different value for the Station Beacon than the values of the repeated packets ?

YES

what do you think to add this as a experimental topic (as I had this some time ago) as to study the coverage area is a "momentary" process

could be experimental

Ciao Ricardo > hi Silvio, > > is a good idea !! > > so you propose to have a different value for the Station Beacon than the values of the repeated packets ? YES > > what do you think to add this as a experimental topic (as I had this some time ago) as to study the coverage area is a "momentary" process could be experimental <!-- github-comment-id:4386091326 -->
Author
Owner

any news on it?

any news on it? <!-- github-comment-id:5000888185 -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: adam/LoRa_APRS_iGate#271